Computer Use 774
Bloggers G: Blog Post - 22 March 2017
Morris (2013) looks at teachers who incorporate technology into the
classroom and how this does not automatically make them digital pedagogue. One
can look at the invention of the Learning Management System (LMS) as an example
thereof. According to Morris (2013), LMS was unsuccessful due to its
prematurity. In other words, it did not push the capability of the internet nor
did it motivate innovation within the classroom. LMS was thus a dull teaching
method which could not match the vastness of the internet. Digital pedagogues
should reach beyond the limitations of the LMS (Learning Management system),
because to them teaching begins with inquiry, not authority or expertise.
According to Hamilton (2014), educational standards can limit the aims
of a critical pedagogy. This means that educational standards can often dominate
teaching circumstances. The reason being that a critical pedagogy exists for
helping students question and challenge these standards. Standards, on the
other hand, would limit them to do so. Hamilton (2014) states that there are
three degrees to developing a richer notion of access that should be taken into
consideration; access, which includes functional access (ability to use),
experiential access (ability to use in personal context), and lastly critical
access (ability to choose to use). These can all be considered limitations of
digital pedagogy.
Practice makes perfect, right? Well, to become an expert at digital
pedagogy one needs plenty of practice, patience, and experimentation. Digital
pedagogy is not a path through the woods, instead, it is a compass which
requires people working together towards a common goal for it to function well
(Stommel, 2013). Generally, teachers will want to embrace digital pedagogy as a
tool in their belt of teaching models. Nevertheless, it may not be as easy as
reading up on the subject and inserting the techniques into the classroom. It
seems that the process of becoming a digital pedagogue will be similar to the
process of learners learning from a digital pedagogue.
Collaborators;
AN Januarie 18477119
HJ Mostert 18286976
JB Joubert 1784188
JK Arendse 17483905
L Adendorff 18255213
M Nortje 17911427
M van der Westhuizen 18432050
N Bodiat 18179320
RA Jagers 15487008
S Land 17494060
Assessment: Ideas and Content = 5, Writing Quality = 3, Community and Collaboration = 3, Total = 11.
ReplyDelete